High-Yield Topics — What the Exams Actually Test
Frequency analysis of all five available past papers — which topics come up in how many exams, in what form (derivation, calculation, discussion), which past-paper questions test them, and which problem sets and lectures train them. Use this to prioritise revision ruthlessly.
- #macroeconomics
- #exam-prep
- #reference
- #high-yield
- #past-paper
How this list was builtEvery question in the five available papers — Sample Exam 2026 (20 MCQs), Moed A 2023-24, Moed B 2023-24, Moed A 2025 and Moed B 2025 (each 6 short + 2 long questions, plus a Miluim question in 2025) — was tagged by topic and counted. The counts below are honest: a topic listed at "5/5" genuinely appears in all five papers. The two long questions (32 points each on the Moed papers, ~64% of the grade) are flagged separately, because that's where the exam is won or lost.
The scoreboard
| Topic | Papers | Long Q? | Typical format |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-period consumption & Euler equation | 5/5 | Yes — a long Q in all four Moed papers | Full derivation (Lagrangian → Euler → solve → comparative statics) |
| Production function & TFP accounting | 5/5 | Yes (inside Moed A 2024 Q7 and Moed A 2025 Q8) | Calculation (back out , , wage) + discussion twists |
| Investment & user cost of capital | 5/5 | Yes (inside both 2025 long Qs) | Calculation — solve the one unknown in user cost |
| Labor supply & taxes (static FOC) | 4/5 | Yes — the second long Q in both Moed B papers | Derivation of + income-vs-substitution discussion |
| Public debt dynamics | 4/5 | No — but a guaranteed short Q | Calculation (forecast ) or qualitative sign-reading |
| Goods-market equilibrium (S/I shifts) | 4/5 | Yes (as final parts of long Qs) | Discussion — shift curves, sign , , |
| Unemployment flows & steady state | 4/5 | No | Calculation (, , , ) |
| Inflation measurement (CPI vs deflator) | 3/5 | No | Calculation from a 3-good table |
| Inequality, polarization & SBTC | 2/5 + Miluim | No | Pure discussion (stylized facts) |
| Task-based production / robots | 2/5 | No | Short calculation or MCQ (sign of ) |
| GDP vs GNP vs NFP | 2/5 | No | Discussion (sign each aggregate) |
| PPP GDP comparisons | 2/5 | No | Calculation (convert, then growth rates) |
| Liquidity constraints & the MPC | 2/5 | No | Discussion (stylized facts) |
| Business cycles (trend vs cyclical) | 1/5 (Miluim only) | No | Discussion |
The big fourTwo-period consumption, production/TFP, investment/user cost, and labor supply with taxes account for both long questions on every Moed paper — roughly 64 of 100 points each sitting. If time is short, drill these four until you can re-derive them from a blank page. Everything else is short-question material worth 6 points a pop.
Tier 1 — appears in every paper
Two-period consumption & the Euler equation — 5/5 papers
The single most-tested topic. Every Moed paper's first long question (32 pts) is a two-period (or three-period) consumption derivation, always the same recipe: write the problem → Lagrangian → FOCs → Euler equation → substitute into the lifetime budget → solve for → comparative statics.
| Where it's tested | The twist |
|---|---|
| Moed A 2024 Q8 (long) | Consumption tax in the budget; log utility makes expenditure invariant to |
| Moed B 2024 Q7 (long) | CRRA utility; can a lower cause a recession? (No — moves the wrong way) |
| Moed A 2025 Q7 (long) | Mandatory retirement saving; optimal ; heterogeneous |
| Moed B 2025 Q7 (long) | Three periods, cake-eating (assets only, no income); higher leaves unchanged under log |
| Moed B 2025 Q4 (short) | Read (slope) and (where growth ) off a consumption-growth vs figure |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q11, Q18 | MCQ versions: role of under CRRA; -rise with log utility and only assets |
- Trained by: PS2 (both questions — mini life-cycle model, log-utility plan) — plus the goods-market follow-ups in PS4.
- Lecture: Lec_02-Consumption and Saving.
- Know cold: the log-utility signature ( = fixed fraction of lifetime wealth, income and substitution effects on cancel exactly) and the CRRA generalisation .
Production function & TFP accounting — 5/5 papers
Shows up at least once in every paper, usually twice. Two moves cover almost every variant: (1) invert Cobb-Douglas to read TFP off as the residual, ; (2) recover a missing from a factor share ( or ).
| Where it's tested | The twist |
|---|---|
| Moed A 2024 Q7 (long) | UK data: build total hours, back out TFP for three years, then feed it into the labor-market and investment models |
| Moed A 2024 Q4 (short) | Additive production function — drops out of , so no labor-demand effect |
| Moed B 2024 Q3 (short) | is missing — recover it from the capital income share |
| Moed A 2025 Q1 (short) | TFP vs capital in a two-country ratio: capital only buys output |
| Moed A 2025 Q8 (long, parts 1–2) | Compute TFP both periods; sign the change without computing (output outgrew both inputs) |
| Moed B 2025 Q3 (short) | Get from the labor share, then TFP level, growth ( under proportional scaling by CRS) and the wage |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q1, Q19 | MCQ versions: growth-accounting comparison; deflator/labor-share claims |
- Trained by: PS3 (all four questions — Cobb-Douglas proofs, labor shares, implied TFP, growth accounting).
- Lecture: Lec_04-Production.
- Know cold: , , and always differentiate the function actually given — the additive-form trap in Moed A 2024 Q4 punishes Cobb-Douglas autopilot.
Investment & the user cost of capital — 5/5 papers
Every paper has a question that reduces to "future MPK = user cost, solve for the one unknown". The examiners rotate which variable is missing: the tax rate, the depreciation rate, future TFP, or the direction of a price effect.
| Where it's tested | The unknown |
|---|---|
| Moed A 2024 Q3 (short) | Signs: ; (label the two lines) |
| Moed B 2024 Q4 (short) | that keeps capital constant (then ) |
| Moed A 2025 Q8 (long, part 3) | , then investment from capital accumulation |
| Moed B 2025 Q1 (short) | Future TFP — build from and first |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q7, Q14, Q20 | MCQ versions: backing out and ; TFP shock on investment vs labor demand; capital-tax rise |
- Trained by: PS4 Q1 (workforce size and optimal investment) and Q3 (taxes and their use); also PS6.
- Lecture: Lec_05-Investment.
Tier 2 — a near-guaranteed question
Labor supply & taxes (the static FOC) — 4/5 papers
Missing only from Moed A 2024. The second long question on both Moed B papers is a labor-supply derivation, and the sample exam has two MCQs on it. One condition does everything:
Recipe: plug in the given , substitute the budget constraint, solve for — then discuss income vs substitution effects.
| Where it's tested | The twist |
|---|---|
| Moed B 2024 Q8 (long) | Laffer curve: revenue ; wage adjustment; revenue recycled into TFP raises the peak rate |
| Moed A 2025 Q3 (short) | With utility and , the tax cancels out of labor supply |
| Moed B 2025 Q8 (long) | Perfectly inelastic supply ; TFP vs shocks and the investment follow-on |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q3, Q15 | MCQ versions: log-power utility; slope of the supply curve under CRRA |
- Trained by: PS5 Q1–Q3 and PS6 Q1–Q2, Q4–Q5 (the whole set is built on this FOC).
- Lectures: Lec_07-Labor Market, Lec_10-Fiscal Policy.
- Know cold: with log consumption utility, income and substitution effects cancel exactly — that one fact answers three of the six questions above.
Public debt dynamics — 4/5 papers
Missing only from Moed A 2025. Always a short question, in one of two flavours: qualitative (map a shock onto the signs of , , ) or numerical forecast — where and are never handed to you directly.
| Where it's tested | The twist |
|---|---|
| Moed A 2024 Q1 | Qualitative: war raises , lowers , raises — all push up |
| Moed B 2024 Q2 | Get from Fisher (), from 20-year compound growth, then plug in |
| Moed B 2025 Q2 | Same trick plus forecast GDP and the debt stock (ratio × GDP) |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q12 | MCQ version of the forecast |
- Trained by: PS6 Q3 (simple public debt dynamics).
- Lecture: Lec_10-Fiscal Policy.
- Know cold: the compound-growth back-out — it appears every time.
Goods-market equilibrium (S and I curves) — 4/5 papers
Rarely a standalone question, but it's the closing act of most long questions and gets two dedicated shorts. The drill: shift each curve separately, then read off which of , , is pinned down and which is ambiguous.
| Where it's tested | The configuration |
|---|---|
| Moed B 2024 Q5 | Pessimism about future TFP: right, left → falls for sure, quantities ambiguous; fixed forces and opposite |
| Moed B 2025 Q6 | Optimistic firms + pessimistic consumers: both curves right → quantities rise, ambiguous |
| Moed A 2024 Q8 (part 5) | Consumption-tax revenue spent now vs later: timing decides whether shifts |
| Moed B 2024 Q7 (part 5) | Lower : left, fixed → up, down |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q16, Q20 | MCQ versions |
- Trained by: PS4 Q2–Q3, PS6 Q1.
- Lecture: Lec_06-Equilibrium in the Goods Market.
- Know cold: the meta-rule — curves shifting in opposite directions pin the price () and leave quantities ambiguous; shifting the same way pin the quantity and leave ambiguous.
Unemployment flows & steady state — 4/5 papers
Missing only from Moed B 2024. Pure plug-in territory once you dodge the classic denominator traps.
| Where it's tested | The trap |
|---|---|
| Moed A 2024 Q2 | "Is this a steady state?" — check whether , don't just quote |
| Moed A 2025 Q5 | "Not employed" ≠ unemployed — back out the labor force from the participation rate first |
| Moed B 2025 Q5 | divides by last month's unemployed, by last month's employed |
| Sample Exam 2026 Q5 | MCQ version with participation data |
- Trained by: PS5 Q4 (steady-state unemployment flows).
- Lecture: Lec_08-Labor Market Data, Participation & Unemployment.
Tier 3 — shorter odds, cheap points
Inflation measurement: CPI vs deflator — 3/5 papers
A three-good table (one good never consumed), compute both measures, explain the gap. Moed A 2024 Q6 (robots drag the deflator negative while the CPI rises), Moed A 2025 Q6 (PCE deflator vs CPI: changing vs fixed basket), Sample Exam 2026 Q6. Rules: strip non-consumption goods out of the CPI (but not the GDP deflator); deflator = changing quantities, CPI = frozen basket. Trained by PS1 Q2, Q3 and Q7; lecture Lec_01-Data Review.
Inequality, polarization & SBTC — 2/5 papers + Miluim
Pure "discussed in class" material, zero algebra: Moed A 2024 Q5 (90/10, 90/50, 50/10 ratios; polarization = rising 90/50 with falling 50/10) and the Moed B 2025 Miluim question (SBTC is monotone, so it explains the college premium but not U-shaped polarization). Trained by PS5; lecture Lec_09-Inequality & Polarization.
Task-based production & robots — 2/5 papers
Moed A 2025 Q2 (immigration lowers robot demand — makes them substitutes) and Sample Exam 2026 Q2 and Q17 (productivity vs displacement effects). The move: check the sign of the cross-partial. Trained by PS5 Q5; lecture Lec_09-Inequality & Polarization.
GDP vs GNP vs NFP — 2/5 papers
Moed A 2025 Q4 (Ukrainian emigration: GDP falls, GNP flat, NFP rises) and Sample Exam 2026 Q4. Anchor: — GDP is where production happens, GNP is who earns. Trained by PS1; lecture Lec_01-Data Review.
PPP comparisons — 2/5 papers
Moed B 2024 Q6 (PPP GDP per capita growth and catch-up) and Sample Exam 2026 Q10. Formula: , then per-capita, then growth. Trained by PS1 Q5; lecture Lec_01-Data Review.
Liquidity constraints & the MPC — 2/5 papers
Moed B 2024 Q1 and Sample Exam 2026 Q9: constraints fall with income; constrained households have the highest MPC; the top-quintile exception is the "wealthy hand-to-mouth". Lecture Lec_02-Consumption and Saving.
Efficient factor allocation across firms — 1/5 papers
Sample Exam 2026 Q8 only, so far: allocate a fixed factor across firms by equalising marginal products. Trained by PS7 (both questions — optimal allocation of capital, and two factors under constant returns); lecture Lec_04-Production. New material since the last problem set, so treat it as live for 2026 despite the thin past-paper record.
Business cycles: trend vs cyclical — 1/5 (Miluim only)
Moed A 2025 Miluim: trend = expected path, cyclical = deviations; non-durables/services consumption is smoother than income, evidencing consumption smoothing. Low priority unless Miluim-eligible.
Reading the formatThe four Moed papers are open-notes (formula sheet attached — see the Macro Equation Sheet) with 6 shorts (6 pts) + 2 longs (32 pts). The Sample Exam 2026 is the 20-question MCQ dress rehearsal for the 2026 format — same toolkit, but distractors punish sign errors and dropped denominators rather than rewarding partial derivations. Revise for the long-question derivations first; MCQ speed comes free once the derivations are automatic.
Next step: turn these frequencies into a schedule — see the Macro Revision Plan.