PS4
- #macroeconomics
- #investment
- #user-cost
- #goods-market
- #capital-accumulation
- #problem-set
Toolkit
- 1
Workforce Size and Optimal Investment
Assume that firms make investment decisions according to the model we discussed in class. Specifically, think about a two-period model and the following assumptions:
- (note: this is the production function for every period)
- and
- and
1. Find the optimal level of and the optimal level of current . For this, follow the usual steps:
(a) What is the value of the user cost? (b) Derive a term for (c) Equate the two to have one equation with one unknown , and solve it. (d) Use the capital accumulation equation to solve for
2. Assume that the goods market is in equilibrium. Calculate the levels of saving and consumption in the economy in the current period.
3. Assume that the labor input rises temporarily (say due to temporary work visas) so that but .
(a) Calculate the levels of GDP and GDP per worker before and after the change. Do GDP and GDP per worker increase or decrease? Briefly explain why. (b) Is there a new level of optimal capital in the future ()? If so, calculate it. If not, explain why not. (c) What are the levels of GDP and GDP per worker in the future period?
4. Now assume that the labor input rises permanently (say due to immigration or increased labor force participation) so that and .
(a) Calculate GDP in the current period. How does it compare to the GDP you calculated in part 2 and part 3(a)? (b) Is there a new level of optimal capital in the future ()? If so, calculate it. If not, explain why not. (c) What is the level of GDP in the future period?
5. Briefly explain the difference in results between parts (3) and (4).
- 2
Optimism and Goods Market Equilibrium
Some economists claim that economic fluctuations can be caused by "waves of optimism" (or pessimism) about the future prospects of the economy. In this question we analyze one example that illustrates such a claim using our goods market equilibrium model.
Suppose that an economy is at a current state of equilibrium where consumers solve their optimal plan, firms know their optimal and investment. In equilibrium, and there is some market clearing real interest rate .
Suppose that producers (firms) in this economy suddenly become optimistic about the future prospects of productivity, i.e. they believe that will be higher than what was initially expected. For simplicity, also assume that consumers do not share this sentiment, and nothing changes in their beliefs.
Briefly answer the questions below, and provide graphs and explanations (where applicable).
1. What is the implication, if any, with regards to savings? Does the S curve shift to the left, to the right, or does not shift?
2. What is the implication, if any, with regards to investment? Does the I curve shift to the left, to the right, or does not shift?
3. As a result of your previous answers, describe the new equilibrium in the goods market: what happens to at the new equilibrium?
4. Going back to the claim about expectations and fluctuations, explain how the change in future output is consistent with the claim. Explain how the change in current consumption is inconsistent with the claim.
- 3
(TA session) Taxes and Their Use
Assume that firms make investment decisions according to the model we discussed in class. Specifically, think about a two-period model and the following assumptions:
- and
- and
1. Find the optimal level of and the optimal level of current . For this, follow the usual steps:
(a) What is the value of the user cost? (b) Derive a term for (c) Equate the two to have one equation with one unknown , and solve it. (d) Use the capital accumulation equation to solve for
2. Assume that the government decides to increase the tax rate from 0.1 to 0.15. Assume that the rest of the parameters remain unchanged. Find the optimal level of and the optimal level of current . (For this, follow the same steps as before).
3. Now assume that the government uses the extra tax proceeds to improve infrastructure that will increase future productivity, i.e. increases to 150. Find the optimal level of and the optimal level of current . (Again, follow the same steps as before).
4. Briefly explain the difference in results between parts (2) and (3).
- 4
(TA session) Effect of Government Spending on Goods Market Equilibrium
Suppose that an economy is at a current state of equilibrium where consumers solve their optimal plan, firms know their optimal and investment. In equilibrium, and there is some market clearing real interest rate .
Suppose that the government announces (unexpectedly) that it is going to increase the current level of government expenditure (). In order to finance the additional spending, the government also announces a one time (or one period) tax increase of the same amount. For simplicity, assume that the tax is imposed "lump-sum", i.e. a fixed amount that will be paid by all consumers in the economy. You may also assume that consumers do not enjoy in any way, and that the government spending is not repaid to the consumers in any way.
Briefly answer the questions below, and provide graphs and explanations (where applicable).
1. What does the shock imply with regards to consumers' current disposable income? consumers' PVLR?
2. If consumers behave according to our standard consumption model, how should their consumption respond? Will it increase/decrease? By more/less/same as the change in government spending?
3. What is the implication, if any, with regards to savings? Does the S curve shift to the left, to the right, or does not shift?
4. What is the implication, if any, with regards to investment? Does the I curve shift to the left, to the right, or does not shift?
5. As a result of your previous answers, describe the new equilibrium in the goods market: what happens to at the new equilibrium?
- 5
(extra practice) When Does More Future Labour Mean More Future Capital?
Assume that firms make investment decisions according to the model we discussed in class, and that the production function is a standard Cobb-Douglas (where is a parameter, is total factor productivity, is capital, and is the labor input). Also assume that the user cost is some constant number .
1. Show that if firms expect to have higher labor input in the future period, then they choose to have more capital for the future period.
2. Will the same result hold if the production function is ? Prove and explain your claim.
(The official solution to this question is printed in the question paper itself.)
Related Notes
- Macro-Economics — subject hub
- Problem Set 3 — Cobb-Douglas properties, TFP
- Lec_02-Consumption and Saving — savings, Euler equation, goods market
- Key concepts: Marginal Product of Capital, User Cost of Capital, Capital Accumulation, Goods Market Equilibrium