Sample Exam 2 (practice) · Ido Eisdorfer · worked-solution

Sample Exam 2 — Worked Solutions

Original paper ↗

Sample Exam 2 — Worked Solutions

Part of: Microeconomics Sample Exam 2 (practice) — Micro 3 — Advanced Microeconomics | Tyomkin School of Economics, Reichman University Builds on: Topic 1 - Asymmetric Information · Topic 2 - Equilibrium in Different Market Structures · Topic 3 - Game Theory · Topic 4 - Price Competition with Complementary Goods Key concepts: Bundling, Moral Hazard, Two-Part Tariff, First-Degree Price Discrimination, Coordination Game, Cournot Competition, Bertrand Competition, Nash Equilibrium

No official solutions

Solved from scratch and checked in Python. Two questions are genuinely awkward as printed — Q3 (the cost-effectiveness numbers point the opposite way to the keyed pairing) and Q6 (the value works out to a number not in the option list). Both are flagged with a [!question] callout; check them against your instructor's key.


What this paper tests

The throughline: extracting surplus from heterogeneous buyers

Exam 2 leans hard on two-part tariffs and price discrimination (Q6, Open Q1) plus the quantity-vs-price competition contrast (Open Q2). The single most useful reflex: a first-degree two-part tariff sets per-unit price = MC and fixed fee = consumer surplus; a uniform tariff for two types has its fee pinned by the smaller consumer.

  • Q1, Q6, Open Q1 — bundling & two-part tariffs.
  • Q2, Q3 — health insurance, cost-effectiveness, moral hazard.
  • Q4, Open Q2 — differentiated competition: substitutes, Cournot vs Bertrand.
  • Q5 — Battle of the Sexes and counting equilibria.
  1. Q1 — Screens sold separately

    A profit-maximizing firm sells computers and screens. The willingness to pay for screens is:

    Customer Screen
    1 800
    2 600
    3 400
    4 200

    The marginal cost of a screen is $300. If the firm sells screens separately, what price maximizes profit from screens?

  2. Q2 — Physician maximises the patient's expected utility

    The following data is for questions 2-3.

    Two treatment alternatives are available:

    Treatment Cost Probability of Success
    A 1,200 0.5
    B 2,400 0.75

    Treatment (B) yields 20 utility units and treatment (A) yields 4 utility units.

    A physician seeks to maximize the expected utility units of an individual patient. Which treatment will the physician choose?

  3. Q3 — HMO maximises utility per fixed budget

    The following data is for questions 2-3.

    Two treatment alternatives are available:

    Treatment Cost Probability of Success
    A 1,200 0.5
    B 2,400 0.75

    Treatment (B) yields 20 utility units and treatment (A) yields 4 utility units.

    Suppose the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) seeks to maximize total expected utility units subject to a fixed budget. Which statement is correct?

  4. Q4 — Substitute products

    Two producers, ii and jj, produce similar substitute products.

    Producer ii faces demand: qi=A−pi+pjq_{i} = A - p_{i} + p_{j} Producer jj faces demand: qj=A−pj+piq_{j} = A - p_{j} + p_{i} Both have constant marginal cost equal to zero. Which statement is correct?

  5. Q5 — Ronit & Dan at the movies

    Ronit and Dan want to go to the movies. Each must choose between "Rambo 5" and "Sense and Sensibility." Ronit has already seen "Rambo 5," so she prefers "Sense and Sensibility." However, if Dan goes to "Rambo 5," she prefers watching "Rambo 5" with him over watching "Sense and Sensibility" alone. Dan has not seen "Rambo 5" and prefers it to "Sense and Sensibility." However, he prefers watching "Sense and Sensibility" with Ronit over watching "Rambo 5" alone. How many Nash equilibria does this game have?

  6. Q6 — Value of identifying consumer types

    A monopolist produces a product for two consumers.

    Consumer 1's demand is: q1=9−pq_{1} = 9 - p Consumer 2's demand is: q2=12−pq_{2} = 12 - p The monopolist has a constant marginal cost of: MC=2MC = 2 The monopolist cannot distinguish between consumers and must offer the same two-part tariff (TPT) to both consumers. A private investigation company offers to identify each consumer type.

    Assuming the monopolist sells only once, what is the maximum amount it should be willing to pay the investigation company?

  7. Open 1a — Pay M: separate two-part tariffs

    A monopolist sells a product to two consumers, Consumer 1 and Consumer 2. The monopolist's cost function is: TC(Q)=20QTC(Q) = 20Q, where: Q=q1+q2Q = q_{1} + q_{2} Consumer 1's demand is: p=200−q1p = 200 - q_{1} Consumer 2's demand is: p=150−q2p = 150 - q_{2}

    A. Assume the monopolist can pay a fixed one-time amount MM, allowing it to distinguish between the two consumers and offer each consumer a separate two-part tariff: (p1,T1),(p2,T2)(p_{1},T_{1}),(p_{2},T_{2}), where pip_{i} is the per-unit price and TiT_{i} is the fixed fee. Find the tariffs chosen by the monopolist.

  8. Open 1b — No M: uniform tariff and maximum M

    B. If the monopolist does not pay MM, it must charge a uniform two-part tariff: (p,T)(p,T) to both consumers. Find the maximum MM the monopolist is willing to pay.

  9. Open 1c — Uniform tariff with general A

    C. Now the monopolist must set a uniform tariff (p,T)(p,T), and Consumer 2's demand is:

    p=A−q2p = A - q_{2} where: A≤200A \leq 200. Assume the monopolist wants to sell to both consumers.

    Find the optimal tariff (p,T)(p,T) as a function of AA. How does pp depend on AA?

  10. Open 1d — Serving only one consumer

    D. Following section C, for which values of A the monopolist will prefer to sell only to one consumer?

  11. Open 2a — Cournot (simultaneous quantities)

    Two firms produce differentiated products q1q_{1} and q2q_{2}. Inverse demands are:

    p1=24−q1−0.5q2p_{1} = 24 - q_{1} - 0.5q_{2}
    p2=24−q2−0.5q1p_{2} = 24 - q_{2} - 0.5q_{1}

    Marginal costs are zero.

    A. Find the Simultaneous quantity competition equilibrium and profit.

  12. Open 2b — Bertrand (simultaneous prices)

    B. Find the Simultaneous Price competition equilibrium and profit (Hint: find both demand functions qiq_i as a function of p1p_1 and p2p_2).

  13. Open 2c — Firm 1 sets quantity, Firm 2 sets price

    C. Find Equilibrium results if Firm 1 chooses quantity and Firm 2 chooses price (Hint: firm 2 price responds to q1q_1, and firm 1 quantity responds to p2p_2).

  14. Open 2d — The strategy game: choose Quantity or Price

    D. Show in a matrix the two strategies each firm faces and find Nash Equilibrium.

    Firm 1 / Firm 2 Quantity Price
    Quantity
    Price

One-page recap

Q Topic Tool Answer
MC1 Bundling Uniform price over WTP ladder C — $600 (profit 600)
MC2 Insurance Physician max expected utility C — Treatment B (E[U]=15>2E[U]=15>2)
MC3 Cost-effectiveness Utility per $ + moral hazard D / likely-keyed E — see flag (B is the cost-effective one)
MC4 Substitutes Symmetric eq.; output ↑ D — prices equal & welfare higher
MC5 Battle of the Sexes Count NE C — 3 (2 pure + 1 mixed)
MC6 Two-part tariff πdisc−πuni\pi^{\text{disc}}-\pi^{\text{uni}} E — value =23.25=23.25 (not listed)
Open 1A First-degree TPT p=MCp=MC, T=CST=CS (20,16200),(20,8450)(20,16200),(20,8450); π=24,650\pi=24{,}650
Open 1B Uniform TPT T=CS2T=CS_2 p=45, T=5512.5p=45,\ T=5512.5; Mmax⁡=7,125M_{\max}=7{,}125
Open 1C Uniform TPT, general AA maximise over pp p∗=120−A2, T∗=98(A−80)2p^*=120-\tfrac A2,\ T^*=\tfrac98(A-80)^2
Open 1D Serve one vs both πboth=πonly1\pi^{\text{both}}=\pi^{\text{only1}} serve one iff A<56+366≈144.2A<56+36\sqrt6\approx144.2
Open 2A Cournot MR=MCMR=MC q=p=9.6, π=92.16q=p=9.6,\ \pi=92.16
Open 2B Bertrand invert demand, MR=MCMR=MC p=8, q=323, π=2563p=8,\ q=\tfrac{32}3,\ \pi=\tfrac{256}3
Open 2C Mixed Q/P cross best-responses π1≈92.0, π2≈85.2\pi_1\approx92.0,\ \pi_2\approx85.2
Open 2D Mode game dominance NE == (Quantity, Quantity) = Cournot
Exam reflexes
  • First-degree TPT → p=MCp = MC, T=CSiT = CS_i. Uniform TPT for two types → fee pinned by the smaller consumer; lean on the per-unit margin.
  • "Value of information / identifying types" → πdiscriminate−πuniform\pi^{\text{discriminate}} - \pi^{\text{uniform}}, not either profit on its own.
  • Substitutes competing → lower prices, higher welfare. Complements → double marginalisation, lower welfare.
  • Cournot vs Bertrand (differentiated) → Bertrand price & profit are lower; given the choice of mode, Quantity dominates → firms land at Cournot.
  • Battle of the Sexes → 2 pure + 1 mixed = 3 equilibria.