Dominated Strategy

Also known as · strictly dominated strategy · weakly dominated strategy

A strategy sis_i is strictly dominated by si′s_i' if, for every possible strategy of the opponent, si′s_i' gives a strictly higher payoff:

ui(si′,s−i)>ui(si,s−i)∀ s−i.u_i(s_i', s_{-i}) > u_i(s_i, s_{-i}) \quad \forall \, s_{-i}.

A rational player will never play a strictly dominated strategy. Weak dominance is the same condition with ≥\geq everywhere and strict inequality in at least one case.

When to use

Check for dominated strategies as the first move when solving any Normal-Form Game. If a strategy is strictly dominated, eliminate it and recurse — this is Iterated Dominance (IESDS). Any Nash Equilibrium survives IESDS, so the procedure is a safe pre-filter before searching for NE. Don't confuse "dominated" with "not a best response": dominance must hold against every opponent strategy.

Appears in

No references yet.