Solving for a mixed-strategy NE
Mixed-strategy Nash Equilibrium is found by the opponent indifference principle: you don't pick your own mixing probability to maximise your own payoff — you pick it to make the opponent indifferent between the strategies they mix over.
- Write the payoff matrix. Let player 1 play strategy with probability (and with ). Let player 2 play strategy with probability (and with ).
- Find (player 2's mix) by making player 1 indifferent: solve as a function of .
- Find (player 1's mix) by making player 2 indifferent: solve as a function of .
- Report the mixed NE as the pair of probability vectors.
- (Optional) Compute each player's expected payoff at the NE; both should equal whichever pure-strategy expected payoff you used in the indifference condition.
type: mixed-strategy-br
All three equilibria of Battle of the Sexes in one picture. The blue and red step-functions are each player's best response to the other's probability of choosing Football. They intersect at three points: the two pure NE at the corners and , and the mixed NE at the interior crossing — where each player makes the other exactly indifferent.
Common pitfalls
- Trying to maximise your own expected payoff over your own mixing probability. At a mixed NE you are indifferent — every mixing probability gives the same expected payoff, so calculus over is meaningless.
- Forgetting which probability solves which indifference. Mnemonic: opponent's mix makes you indifferent, so to find player 2's mix you set player 1 indifferent, and vice versa.
- Asserting a mixed NE exists when one strategy strictly dominates. Discard strictly dominated strategies first; the mixed NE is supported only over the surviving strategies.
Worked example
| L | R | |
|---|---|---|
| U | 0, 2 | 3, 0 |
| D | 2, 0 | 0, 3 |
(See Topic 3 Q4.) Step 2 — set : . Step 3 — set : . Mixed NE: .